Michael Jackson Not Guilty

**deviantdee** · June 14th, 2005, 11:14 AM

Yeh, those dirty border jumpers - send 'em all
up the river!

Re the crazy mother: I think she's the victim
of bad rehearsal. If she had composed what she
really wanted to say in advance, instead of all
blurting it out stream of consciously (like one of
Hunter's posts - [img]tongue.gif[/img] - ), she might have been
listened to more intently.

How does he recover? Easy. Stick 'Jesus Juice'
on the market. What was it - red wine in a coke
can? Coke and Red Wine - there you go.

'The cocktail which can be drunk my minors!'

D.

**Ian Rich Rags** · June 14th, 2005, 11:38 AM

Can't help think you are missing the point D. I think he was guilty too, but if someone punches you in a bar and you're up for some comp, why risk it by saying your assailant came at you with a knife and screaming that he had been plotting to do you for months?
You would be insinutating forethought and an attempted assualt with a weapon in order to make something look much worse. If you get found out lying then nothing you say can be considered reliable surely? She f**ked it up by trying to get everyone to paint a much more vivid picture than was maybe the truth and in doing so she made it too unbeleievabe. Look at her history.
She sued JC Penny after saying she was not after financial compensation. If someone had walked in on Jacko in the act, then he would have been playing bitch boy to Bubba right now, but they didnt and when the accusers mom starts acting like Liza Minelli on Acid, it just created too much suspicion of motive.

<font color="#FF0000" size="1">[ June 14, 2005 08:39 AM: Message edited by: IH Rich Rags ]</font>

**deviantdee** · June 14th, 2005, 11:48 AM

You make fair points, sadly I'm already bored
about discussing this schtuupid trial. It high-
lighted for me everything I despise about America,
but let's not go into that.

D.